| |
Within
this crazed, hyperbolic, fatally excessive monstrosity, a horror novel
which proved too much even for horror's undemanding and star-struck readership,
there exists the teasing little ghost of a tale about the intersection
of an industrial accident and an accursed village. The hints one has while
reading Floating Dragon of this unrealized story, glimpses of what the
book might have been, justify a brief account of the circumstances under
which it was written, even as they cast a colder, harsher light on what
it finally became. The sense of what Floating Dragon might have been,
i.e. a swift, intriguing yarn in a post-Lovecraftian manner, makes its
failure to locate narrative containment of any sort all the more offensive,
but the perspective granted by "inside" knowledge of the author's
situation at the time may at least provide some explanation of the catastrophe.
The inexplicable chilliness which had affected my relationship with the
Straubs - he my oldest friend, she his deeply valued daily support and
buffer against the world's intrusions (I must say, Peter is perhaps the
most deeply defended person I've ever known) - toward the end of their
long residence in London dissipated altogether upon their return to the
United States in 1979. At this time, they would have been well advised
to return to their native Midwest, as I took pains at every opportunity
to point out. The purchase of a modest but accommodating house in Milwaukee
would not only have saved them a vast, in fact an actually almost unimaginable
sum in real estate costs, home repairs, taxes and so forth, at a stroke
eliminating my stressed-out friend's continuous financial anxieties, it
would also have reconciled him to his humble but sturdy roots, thereby
freeing him from the neurotic fixation on his birthplace which deforms
the next stage of his work. Failing that, I could have found them a perfectly
adequate residence right here in Popham, and it would have been no problem
for me to arrange a non-tenure-track appointment for the returning author
in our English Department, involving minimal teaching duties, a bi-annual
reading, and all the accompanying benefits. This generous offer fell upon
deaf ears, four of them. Instead, Peter chose to purchase a crumbling
mansion located in Connecticut's "Gold Coast," Fairfield County.
Specifically, in the town of Westport. Nothing less congenial could be
imagined.
I visited the Straubs on two occasions during their residence in Westport,
early and late, that is, in 1980, during the first flush of my old friend's
success, and in 1983, his fortieth year, by which time his loathing of
his adopted town had so undone him that he spent his weary days, to judge
by those he spent with me, in piloting his yacht-like Mercedes from one
bar to another. Alarmed by his behavior, which incorporated an inordinate
degree of churlishness toward this long-time friend and confidant, I staged
a one-man, personal intervention and convinced him to change his ways,
whereupon he embarked upon Koko. But that is another story, to be addressed
in its own time.
We are concerned now with my first visit to 1, Beachside Common, Westport,
the ruins of a formerly grand house still in the throes of restoration
when I appeared for a weekend's visit which extended for another five
happy days upon the conclusion of the 1980 Conference on Popular Culture
in New York, at which I had been gratified by the presentation of that
year's Elmer J. Atwood Award For Superior Achievement in the Field of
Popular Culture Studies. The "Atwood," as we call it, is a handsome
little cast-iron sculpture in the form of a 1951 Motorola television set,
and it so weighted the largest of my suitcases as I trudged toward Peter
and Susan's new residence from the Greens Farms train station, following
a none-too-accurate map hand-drawn on what appeared to be a cocktail napkin
by my old friend, that I had sweated through my undershirt, shirt and
suit jacket by the time I had managed to get myself and my complement
of luggage up onto their porch. Various muscular workmen under the command
of a white-bearded giant (a gentleman later to be affectionately drawn
as "Ben Roehm" in both Floating Dragon and Koko) observed this
entire process without offering any assistance whatsoever. Susan Straub
opened the door with the infant Emma in her arms and three-year-old Benjamin
Straub beside her. Little Ben's face illuminated with a smile, Susan's,
alas, fell. I attribute this less-than-hospitible response to the sight
of my many bags and the thought that she might have to assist me with
them. In any case, she doubltless remembered the invitation to drop in
any time I was in the vicinity her husband had given me a scant three
weeks before at the end of a telephone conversation, recovered her politesse
and invited me in. Little Benjamin instantly darted forward and kicked
me smartly in my right ankle, resulting in a nasty dark discoloration
which persists to this day.
After the installation of my various bags in the guest room, a space
scarcely large enough to accommodate the requirements of the usual traveller,
and a hasty sponge-bath, I was escorted upstairs to my friend's newest
office, which occupied the entire third floor of the spacious manse. I
had been informed that months of work had resulted in a space Peter found
"very nice," even "good for work." These mild words
in no way prepared me for the sybaritic grandeur the once-impoverished
author now deemed appropriate to his station in life. A parquet floor,
an immense Oriental rug, an Italian sofa of butter-soft leather some ten
feet long and two matching chairs like leather thrones, huge glass-and-marble
coffee tables with marble ashtrays weighing at least fifteen pounds apiece,
hand-made bookshelves, massive speakers on clever revolving stands, graphics
by an internationally well-known artist, a state-of-the-art set of stereo
or "hi-fi" components in a handsome wooden case, many subtle,
even cunning, lights, a half-mile of records near the expansive desk,
two skylights, hand-fashioned wooden platforms beneath the dormer windows,
all of it elegantly disposed within a space the size of a bowling alley.
I believe the only reason I did not faint away altogether before the attack
of light-headedness which this display of lunatic expenditure brought
on was that on the desk itself I observed an open journal and a jar filled
with pencils - Peter was, at least, still writing his books by hand, he
had not completely lost his mind. For a dread moment, I had feared to
see a "computer's" or "word processor's" hideous shape
there.
Those who have become parents to small children tend to forget that adult
guests and visitors do not share their obsession with the offspring, grow
weary of the perpetual demands made by the little dears, not to mention
the tears, screams, howls and other unpleasant noises emanating from the
adored, and wish for conversation on subjects other than the children's
accomplishments, in fact heartily desire that the precious wee ones might
be sent off to a distant room for lengthy periods, especially when one
of them imagines it a comic treat to deliver sharp little kicks to the
adult guest's tender ankles. So it was with my hosts, and it was with
a magnificent display of good-humored tact that I marvelled at little
Benjamin's messy performance with a bowl of spaghetti and little Emma's
hunger for the maternal breast. (There are spectacles a guest really ought
be spared.) I do not believe that the besotted parents ever quite comprehended
the honor bestowed up me by the "Atwood," and their failure
to give adequate attention to the fine points of the speech I delivered
at the Conference during any one of the half-dozen opportunities I granted
them would have disappointed me deeply had I not known of their hunger
for any sort of intellectual discourse, even if it had to be repeated
to be grasped. In fact, the few occasions for anything like serious discussion
over the course of this week-long visit presented themselves either late
at night in Peter's office, when Susan and the children were safely tucked
in bed, or in his automobile as I accompanied him on his frequent journeys
to Waldbaum's supermarket in search of diapers and the like. What I gleaned
of his current project during these conversations filled me with a familiar
unease.
My hapless old chum, he who would never have escaped Professor Military's
Philosophy 101 course with a passing grade much less his eventual A without
my thrice-weekly tutorials, was now resolved to devote a lengthy novel
to the problem of the indertiminacy of reality, a theme well beyond his
intellectual abilities. Even worse, he intended to clothe this theme in
horror's gaudiest and most self-referential motley, to court excess and
its concomitant shapelessness deliberately, abandon all restraint as a
matter of principle, and indulge himself by exploiting every cliche of
situation and imagery known to horror, or at least those that should come
into his mind, not to invoke their pulp-magazine capacity to entertain,
but to exemplify and summarize the genre of horror itself, to objectify
it within the context of indeterminacy, to simultaneously undermine and
celebrate the very genre from which it detached itself by this objectification!
He did not use these words, he was barely conscious of his own intentions,
but this is what he meant. Even more fatally, as well as employing diaries,
invented histories, etc., in another misguided attempt at intertextuality,
the book would finally reveal itself as the work of one its own characters!
His final delusion was that this grotesquery, at once arid and overblown,
would be met with overwhelming approval by the fans, aficionados and connoisseurs
of horror.
The actual reception of this farrago by those for it was most intended
was best epitomized by the review written by Thomas M. Disch for Twilight
Zone. Sensible Mr. Disch eviscerated the book, pointing out with an appalled
amusement its sloppiness, verbosity, slap-dash construction and sophomoric
errors of style. Other, less intelligent genre reviewers expressed their
disappointment at what they took to be a reckless imitation of Stephen
King, their favorite writer. Influenced more by its author's reputation
than the book itself, the British Fantasy Society bestowed upon it their
Best Novel Award for 1983, a matter which cooler heads amongst that august
organization must still find embarrassing. Of course, the general reading
public gobbled it up. The careers of Tom Clancy, John Grisham, Robert
Ludlum, Anne Rice and many others demonstrate that the public at large
will read anything at all, providing it is bad enough.
Floating Dragon does offer some tender pages toward the end, if you have
the stomach to read that far. I must say that I was horrified but not
at all surprised to learn that Peter had virtually committed artistic
suicide half-way through the book - he purchased a "word processor."
Thenceforth, he processed words instead of writing them.

— Putney Tyson Ridge
|
|